4.6 Article

Gaining effect of flower-like ZnO nanowire arrays on the responsivity performance of Cu2O/ZnO heterojunction photodetector

Journal

JOURNAL OF LUMINESCENCE
Volume 254, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jlumin.2022.119477

Keywords

Heterojunction; Cu2O; ZnO nanowire Arrays; Photodetectors; Light responsivity

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent studies have shown that nanostructures have a significant gain effect on the performance of photodetectors (PDs). In this study, Cu2O and ZnO films were prepared using electrochemical and magnetron sputtering methods, respectively, and ZnO nanowire arrays (NWAs) were grown on Cu2O/ZnO PDs using a hydrothermal method. The introduction of ZnO nanowires effectively improved the responsivity and light absorption of the Cu2O/ZnO PD by about 16 times. The ZnO nanowires also enhanced the detection sensitivity of the Cu2O/ZnO/ZnO NWs PD by nearly 5 times, demonstrating their remarkable improvement for heterojunction PDs.
In recent years, many studies have shown that nanostructures have an excellent gain effect on the performance of photodetectors (PDs). In this paper, Cu2O and ZnO was prepared by electrochemical and magnetron sputtering methods respectively, then the ZnO nanowire arrays (NWAs) were grown on Cu2O/ZnO PD by hydrothermal method. After growing ZnO nanowires (NWs), the responsivity of the Cu2O/ZnO PD was increased by about 16 times, and the absorption of light by PD was also greatly improved, indicating that the introduction of the NWs can effectively improve the absorption and utilization of the light by the Cu2O/ZnO PD. Moreover, the built-in electric field of Cu2O/ZnO can effectively separate electron-hole pairs and inhibit their recombination. The detection sensitivity of Cu2O/ZnO/ZnO NWs PD is increased by nearly 5 times, which proves that ZnO NWs have a remarkable improvement for heterojunction PDs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available