4.1 Article

Characteristics of ipsilateral, contralateral and bilateral masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential in healthy adults

Journal

JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0022215123000051

Keywords

Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials; masseter muscle; brainstem; otolithic membrane; VEMPs; evoked potentials

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential in healthy adults using clicks and 500 Hz tone burst stimuli. The results showed that the amplitude of the p11-n21 complex was higher for 500 Hz tone burst than for click stimulus, and bilateral stimulation elicited a larger response than ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to characterise the ipsilateral, contralateral and bilateral masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential using clicks and 500 Hz tone burst stimuli in healthy adults.MethodMasseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential was recorded from 20 healthy participants aged 19-28 years (11 males and 9 females). Masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential was recorded using 500 Hz tone burst and click stimuli in ipsilateral, contralateral and bilateral modes.ResultsA statistically significant difference was observed between ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation for p11 latency, n21 latency and p11-n21 amplitude for both click and 500 Hz tone burst stimuli. The amplitude of the p11-n21 complex was higher for ipsilateral, contralateral and bilateral stimulations for 500 Hz tone burst than for click stimulus.ConclusionThis study showed a significant difference for p11-n21 amplitude between click and 500 Hz tone burst evoked masseter vestibular-evoked myogenic potential. In addition, bilateral stimulation elicited a larger response than ipsilateral and contralateral stimulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available