Journal
JOURNAL OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC & ADVANCED SURGICAL TECHNIQUES
Volume 32, Issue 12, Pages 1255-1259Publisher
MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/lap.2022.0238
Keywords
single incision; laparoscopic appendectomy; minimally invasive
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study retrospectively reviewed patients with uncomplicated appendicitis who underwent SILA from 2011 to 2020. The results showed that SILA had shorter operative time compared to CLA, without significant differences in length of stay, complication rate, and readmission rate.
Purpose: Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) for the treatment of appendicitis has been documented. Typically, SILA requires the use of specialized ports, instruments, and materials. The SILA technique at our institution utilizes the same instrumentation as the conventional laparoscopic approach (CLA), thus obviating the need for these specialized products. This study aims to further demonstrate the noninferiority of our SILA technique for the treatment of uncomplicated appendicitis.Materials and Methods: This is a single-institution retrospective review of patients who underwent SILA from 2011 to 2020 to treat uncomplicated appendicitis. Outcomes including demographics, operative time, length of stay (LOS), and common postsurgical complications were evaluated. These SILA cases were matched with up to 3 CLA controls based on age, gender, and weight utilizing the Greedy match method. Patients with an operative diagnosis of perforated appendicitis were excluded.Results: A total of 137 patients underwent SILA at a single institution. A total of 128 patients were in the final cohort after excluding perforated appendicitis. Mean age was 11.9 years. Case-control matching was conducted with 349 controls included. Between cases and controls, SILA had shorter operative time (27.2 minutes versus 43.7 minutes, P < .001) with no difference in mean LOS (42.4 hours versus 42.4 hours, P = .88). There was no difference in complication rate (5.4% versus 8.5%, P = .06). There was no difference in readmission rate (0.8% versus 3.4%, P = .108).Conclusion: These data suggest that for appropriately selected patients, our SILA technique is noninferior to CLA with shortened operative time.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available