4.4 Article

3D printing to simulate laparoscopic choledochal surgery

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 51, Issue 5, Pages 828-831

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.093

Keywords

3-dimensional printing; Surgical simulation; Choledochal cyst excision

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims of the Study: Laparoscopic simulation has transformed skills acquisition for many procedures. However, realistic nonbiological simulators for complex reconstructive surgery are rare. Life-like tactile feedback is particularly difficult to reproduce. Technological innovations may contribute novel solutions to these shortages. We describe a hybrid model, harnessing 3D technology to simulate laparoscopic choledochal surgery for the first time. Methods: Digital hepatic anatomy images and standard laparoscopic trainer dimensions were employed to create an entry level laparoscopic choledochal surgery model. The information was fed into a 3D systems project 660pro with visijet pxl core powder to create a free standing liver mold. This included a cuboid portal in which to slot disposable hybrid components representing hepatic and pancreatic ducts and choledochal cyst. The mold was used to create soft silicone replicas with T28 resin and T5 fast catalyst. The model was assessed at a national pediatric surgery training day. Results: The 10 delegates that trialed the simulation felt that the tactile likeness was good (5.6/10 +/- 1.71, 10 = like the real thing), was not too complex (6.2/10 +/- 1.35; where 1 = too simple, 10 = too complicated), and generally very useful (7.36/10 +/- 1.57, 10 = invaluable). 100% stated that they felt they could reproduce this in their own centers, and 100% would recommend this simulation to colleagues. Conclusion: Though this first phase choledochal cyst excision simulation requires further development, 3D printing provides a useful means of creating specific and detailed simulations for rare and complex operations with huge potential for development. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available