4.4 Article

Citation metrics and evaluation of journals and conferences

Journal

JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SCIENCE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/01655515231151411

Keywords

Bibliometrics; citation metrics; conference; journal; publication ranking; scientometrics; venue evaluation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Citation analysis evaluates the impact of scientific manuscripts, authors, and publication venues. Metrics like Impact Factor (IF) and H-index are commonly used for measuring journal and conference impact. This review categorizes citation metrics based on their applicability for evaluating journals and conferences, and discusses the role of prestige measuring indicators like SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) and Eigenfactor. The proposed Normalized Immediacy Index (IInorm) offers a way to measure the immediate relevance of articles published in journals/conferences and shows strong correlations with traditional metrics.
Citation analysis aims at evaluating the published scientific manuscripts, their authors and the publication venues (journals/conferences). There are several popular metrics for measuring the impact of the journals, the Impact Factor (IF) being the most popular. Similarly, the H -index is a popular metric for evaluating and ranking conferences. We have presented a review of metrics for citation analysis, categorised according to their applicability for evaluating journals and conferences. The citation metrics may also be categorised as popularity measuring and prestige measuring. Prestige measuring indicators like SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) and Eigenfactor have already gained popularity for evaluating journals. We discuss their role in evaluating the conferences. Indeed, some conferences have already started mentioning their prestige score in terms of the SJR of their conference proceedings. We also propose a Normalised Immediacy Index ( IInorm ), a variant of the Immediacy Index ( II ), to measure the immediate relevance of articles published in a journal/conference. It is shown that the proposed metric can be used for immediacy relevance comparison irrespective of the publication schedule of the articles. Spearman correlation was run to determine the relationship between the values of the proposed IInorm and traditional metrics ( H -index for conferences and IF for journals). A strong, positive monotonic correlation was observed between IInorm and H-index ( r(s) = .67, n = 17, p < .01) for conferences and between I I norm and IF ( r(s) = .65, n = 20, p < .01) for journals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available