4.7 Article

Mapping inland water bathymetry with Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) on board Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs)

Journal

JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY
Volume 616, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128789

Keywords

UAS; Drone; Water depth; Bathymetry; Sonar; GPR

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bathymetry is crucial for river maintenance and flood risk management. This paper explores the use of drone-borne and water-coupled GPR to measure bathymetry in non-frozen inland water bodies. The results show that drone-borne GPR has similar accuracy to water-coupled GPR and outperforms traditional sonar measurements in water bodies with dense vegetation.
Bathymetry of inland water bodies is essential for river maintenance and flood risk management. Traditionally, in shallow water bodies, bathymetry is retrieved by operators wading through the water body with Real Time Kinematic (RTK) Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS), whilst in deeper waters, it is retrieved with sonar instruments on manned or unmanned boats. In the past, researchers have documented the use of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) on boats (i.e. water-coupled GPR) for monitoring the bathymetry of frozen and non -frozen water bodies. Furthermore, GPR has been used on helicopters for monitoring ice and snow thickness. However, deployment of GPR on board Unmanned Aerial Systems (UASs) in non-frozen inland water bodies with electric conductivity higher than 100 mu S/cm (as is common in most inland waterbodies in non-polar regions) is unexplored. In this paper, we document the possibility to use drone-borne and water-coupled GPR in several cross-sections located in three different waterbodies (1 lake and 2 rivers) in Denmark. These waterbodies had different bed sediment materials and vegetation conditions, an electric conductivity varying from 200 to 340 mu S/ cm and depths up to 2.5 m. Drone-borne GPR showed accuracy similar to water-coupled GPR when compared to RTK GNSS ground-truth measurements, with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of approx. 8 cm. The only limitations of drone-borne GPR were i) more restrictive minimum depth requirement (typically 0.8-1.1 m for drone-borne GPR, while 0.3-0.4 m for water-coupled GPR) ii) requirement to fly the GPR antenna at altitudes of approx. 0.5 m above the water surface to avoid high spreading losses and strong surface clutter events hiding the signal. Finally, GPR measurements were benchmarked against traditional sonar measurements, showing that GPR measurements significantly outperform sonar measurements in waterbodies with medium or high density of aquatic vegetation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available