4.3 Article

Early evidence for bear exploitation during MIS 9 from the site of Schoningen 12 (Germany)

Journal

JOURNAL OF HUMAN EVOLUTION
Volume 177, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103294

Keywords

Skinning; Lower Paleolithic; Late Middle Pleistocene

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cutmarked bear metatarsal and phalanx from German open-air sites provide early evidence for the exploitation of bear skins during the interglacial optimum of MIS 9. This finding suggests bear hunting and primary access to bear skins shortly after the animal's death. The delicate cutmarks found on the specimens indicate similarities in butchery patterns to bears from other Paleolithic sites.
A cutmarked bear metatarsal and phalanx from the German open-air sites of Schoeuroningen 12 II-1 and 12 B, respectively, correlated with the interglacial optimum of MIS 9 (ca. 320 ka), provide early evidence for the exploitation of bear skins. Archaeological sites with evidence of bear exploitation from the Lower Paleolithic are rare, with only Boxgrove (United Kingdom) and Bilzingsleben (Germany) yielding cut-marked bear bones indicating skinning. We interpret these finds as evidence for bear hunting and pri-mary access since bear skins are best extracted shortly after the animal's death. The very thin cutmarks found on the Schoeuroningen specimens indicate delicate butchering and show similarities in butchery patterns to bears from other Paleolithic sites. The Eurasian Lower Paleolithic record does not show any evidence for the exploitation of bear meat; only Middle Paleolithic sites, such as Biache-Saint-Vaast (France; ca. 175 ka) and Taubach (Germany; ca. 120 ka), yield evidence for the exploitation of both skin and meat from bear carcasses. Bear skins have high insulating properties and might have played a role in the adaptations of Middle Pleistocene hominins to the cold and harsh winter conditions of Northwestern Europe.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available