4.5 Article

Erenumab versus topiramate: post hoc efficacy analysis from the HER-MES study

Journal

JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01511-y

Keywords

Erenumab; Topiramate; Calcitonin gene-related peptide; Preventive; Migraine; Efficacy; Standard of care

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharma GmbH, Nuremberg, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The HER-MES trial was the first head-to-head study comparing erenumab to topiramate, and the results demonstrated that erenumab had better tolerability and efficacy in treating migraines.
Objective: HER-MES was the first head-to-head, phase 4 trial to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of erenumab against standard of care treatment (topiramate). This post hoc analysis compared the efficacy of erenumab with topiramate in patients who completed the trial on study medication. Methods: Post hoc sensitivity analysis was performed using the full analysis set. Outcomes assessed included the proportion of patients with a >= 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) from baseline (50% responder rate), over the last 3 months (months 4, 5, and 6) of the double-blind treatment phase (DBTP), the 50% responder rate during the first month of the DBTP, and change from baseline in MMD during the DBTP. Multiple imputation was done for efficacy values of patients who discontinued study treatment. Results: Patients (N = 777) were randomly assigned (1:1) to either 70 or 140 mg/month erenumab (N = 389) or 50-100 mg/day topiramate (N = 388). Of these, 334 patients (85.9%) receiving erenumab, and 231 patients (59.5%) receiving topiramate completed the DBTP on study medication. Patients on study medication until the end of the DBTP received a mean dose of 119 mg/month for erenumab and 92 mg/day for topiramate. At month 1, a significantly greater proportion of patients receiving erenumab (39.2%) reported >= 50% reduction in MMD from baseline compared with those receiving topiramate (24.0%; p < 0.001). In the last 3 months, a significantly larger proportion of patients receiving erenumab (60.3%) achieved >= 50% reduction in MMD from baseline compared with those receiving topiramate (43.3%; p < 0.001). Patients receiving erenumab demonstrated significantly greater reductions in MMD during the last 3 months from baseline versus those receiving topiramate (- 6.13 vs - 4.90; 95% CI: - 1.87 to - 0.61; p < 0.001). Conclusions: This post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly superior efficacy of erenumab versus topiramate in achieving a >= 50% reduction in MMD with an early onset of efficacy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available