4.7 Article

Effects of elevated CO2 on the Cd uptake by rice in Cd-contaminated paddy soils

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 442, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130140

Keywords

FACE; Rice; Cadmium; Iron plaque; Soil pe plus pH

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the effects and mechanisms of elevated CO2 concentration on cadmium (Cd) uptake by rice in a 3-year experiment. The results show that increased CO2 concentration leads to higher levels of dissolved Fe2+ in soil, resulting in more low-crystalline Fe oxides being deposited on the root surface. This inhibits the uptake of Cd by rice.
The rising atmospheric CO2 is a major driver for climate change, directly affects rice production. Cadmium (Cd) in paddy soils also serves as a persistent concern. Currently, few studies consider the rice response to coupled stresses of elevated CO2 (eCO2) and soil Cd. Experimental evidence understanding the effects and mechanisms of eCO2 on Cd uptake by rice is lacking yet. In a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) system, a 3-year pot experiment was conducted to explore the Cd uptake by rice under two CO2 conditions (ambient and ambient + 200 mu mol.mol- 1) using combinations of in-situ Cd-contaminated soils and associated rice varieties. Results showed that more low-crystalline Fe oxides (Feh) in iron plaque (IP) were deposited on root surface with the increased dissolved Fe2+ due to lower soil redox status under eCO2. The Cd accumulation in rice was hindered due to more Cd associated with Feh (Feh-Cd) rather than uptake by roots. Taken together, the relative effects of eCO2 on Cd uptake by rice were consistent across years under different Cd-contaminated soils. Our findings will help to better understand the Cd uptake by rice under future climate conditions, and thus push the development of climate -crop-soil models and accurate prediction for food security.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available