4.1 Article

Processing Information After a Child's Cancer DiagnosisHow Parents Learn: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY NURSING
Volume 33, Issue 6, Pages 447-459

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1043454216668825

Keywords

education; parents; pediatric oncology; new diagnosis

Funding

  1. Children's Oncology Group Nursing Fellowship in Patient/Family Education
  2. National Cancer Institute/National Clinical Trials Network Group Operations Center Grant [U10CA180886]
  3. Alex's Lemonade Stand Foundation
  4. National Cancer Institute [R13CA196165]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Parents of a child newly diagnosed with cancer must receive an extensive amount of information before their child's initial hospital discharge; however, little is known about best practices for providing this education. An interpretive descriptive study design was used to describe actual and preferred educational content, timing, and methods among parents of children newly diagnosed with cancer prior to their child's first hospital discharge. Twenty parents of children diagnosed with various malignancies participated in individual interviews 2 to 12 months after their child's diagnosis. Data were analyzed using constant comparative analysis. Education delivery occurred in a telling manner at diagnosis transitioning to a reciprocal process of teaching during the inpatient stay, then primarily back to telling immediately before discharge. Parents expressed a variety of preferred learning styles but noted that their preferences were rarely assessed by health care providers. Multiple factors influenced parents' ability to process educational information received during their child's initial hospitalization. Findings suggest that nursing practices should include assessing for influencing factors, providing anticipatory guidance, and incorporating parents' preferred learning style into the educational plan.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available