4.6 Article

Mitigating the Isolation of Minoritized Faculty in Academic Medicine

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 1751-1755

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07982-8

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing numbers of underrepresented faculty in medicine have attracted attention in academic health systems. Understanding their experiences can help create inclusive and supportive environments, promoting faculty success. Compared to non-minoritized faculty, minoritized faculty face racism, isolation, disparities in diversity and clinical efforts, lack of faculty development, and promotion disparities. This article focuses on the often overlooked issue of isolation and provides strategies for recognizing and mitigating it to foster inclusivity for all faculty.
Increasing numbers of faculty who are underrepresented in medicine has been a focus of academic health systems. Understanding the experiences of these faculty helps in creating environments that are inclusive and supportive, promoting faculty success. When compared with non-minoritized faculty, minoritized faculty face racism, isolation, diversity efforts disparities, clinical efforts disparities, lack of faculty development, and promotion disparities. While there have been contributions to the literature to better characterize disparities faced by minoritized faculty, little has been written about isolation. Isolation occurs when faculty underrepresented in medicine do not feel like part of the department or institution. They may feel excluded from mainstream culture as if they are invisible. They may be excluded from conversations, group chats, get togethers, or other work-related or social functions. These feelings can manifest as imposter syndrome and impact work performance and decision-making. In this article, the author shares how to recognize and mitigate isolation to promote an inclusive environment for all faculty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available