Journal
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 1655-1663Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07998-0
Keywords
-
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study analyzed the prevalence of inappropriate hospital admissions and its association with patient characteristics. The results showed a prevalence of 11.9% and a significant financial impact. Patients with certain risk factors and surgical admissions were more likely to have inappropriate admissions.
Background Inappropriate hospital admissions compromise the efficiency of the health care system. This work analyzes, for the first time, the prevalence of inappropriate admission and its association with clinical and epidemiological patient characteristics.Objectives To estimate the prevalence, associated risk factors, and economic impact of inappropriate hospital admissions.Design and Participants This was a cross-sectional observational study of all hospitalized patients in a high complexity hospital of over 901 beds capacity in Spain. The prevalence of inappropriate admission and its causes, the association of inappropriateness with patients' intrinsic risk factors (IRFs), and associated financial costs were analyzed with the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol in a multivariate model.Main Measures and Key Results A total of 593 patients were analyzed, and a prevalence of inappropriate admissions of 11.9% (95% CI: 9.5 to 14.9) was found. The highest number of IRFs for developing health care-related complications was associated with inappropriateness, which was more common among patients with 1 IRF (OR [95% CI]: 9.68 [3.6 to 26.2.] versus absence of IRFs) and among those with surgical admissions (OR [95% CI]: 1.89 [1.1 to 3.3] versus medical admissions). The prognosis of terminal disease reduced the risk (OR [95% CI]: 0.28 [0.1 to 0.9] versus a prognosis of full recovery based on baseline condition). Inappropriate admissions were responsible for 559 days of avoidable hospitalization, equivalent to euro17,604.6 daily and euro139,076.4 in total, mostly attributable to inappropriate emergency admissions (euro96,805.3).Conclusions The prevalence of inappropriate admissions is similar to the incidence found in previous studies and is a useful indicator in monitoring this kind of overuse. Patients with a moderate number of comorbidities were subject to a higher level of inappropriateness. Inappropriate admission had a substantial and avoidable financial impact.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available