4.6 Article

Evidence-Based Interventions to Improve Opioid Prescribing in Primary Care: a Qualitative Assessment of Implementation in Two Studies

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 38, Issue 8, Pages 1794-1801

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07909-3

Keywords

primary care; opioids; patient safety; chronic pain; HIV; prescribing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the barriers, facilitators, and issues related to the wider implementation of a multi-faceted intervention for promoting guideline-adherent long-term opioid therapy in primary care settings. The intervention was generally well-received, with most participants valuing the didactic and team-based elements. Proximity to expertise, availability of behavioral health care, and support from a Nurse Care Manager were identified as facilitators of adopting new prescribing practices. However, concerns were raised about the intervention's appropriateness in specific clinical environments and its long-term sustainability.
Background The TOPCARE and TEACH randomized controlled trials demonstrated the efficacy of a multi-faceted intervention to promote guideline-adherent long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) in primary care settings. Intervention components included a full-time Nurse Care Manager (NCM), an electronic registry, and academic detailing sessions. Objective This study sought to identify barriers, facilitators, and other issues germane to the wider implementation of this intervention. Design We conducted a nested, qualitative study at 4 primary care clinics (TOPCARE) and 2 HIV primary care clinics (TEACH), where the trials had been conducted. Approach We purposively sampled primary care physicians and advanced practice providers (hereafter: PCPs) who had received the intervention. Semi-structured interviews explored perceptions of the intervention to identify unanticipated barriers to and facilitators of implementation. Interview transcripts were analyzed through iterative deductive and inductive coding exercises. Key Results We interviewed 32 intervention participants, 30 physicians and 2 advanced practice providers, who were majority White (66%) and female (63%). Acceptability of the intervention was high, with most PCPs valuing didactic and team-based intervention elements, especially co-management of LTOT patients with the NCM. Adoption of new prescribing practices was facilitated by proximity to expertise, available behavioral health care, and the NCM's support. Most participants were enthusiastic about the intervention, though a minority voiced concerns about the appropriateness in their particular clinical environments, threats to the patient-provider relationship, or long-term sustainability. Conclusion TOPCARE/TEACH participants found the intervention generally acceptable, appropriate, and easy to adopt in a variety of primary care environments, though some challenges were identified. Careful attention to the practical challenges of implementation and the professional relationships affected by the intervention may facilitate implementation and sustainability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available