4.5 Article

Impact of Case Difficulty, Endodontic Mishaps, and Instrumentation Method on Endodontic Treatment Outcome and Quality of Life: A Four-Year Follow-up Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS
Volume 49, Issue 4, Pages 382-389

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.01.005

Keywords

AAE case difficulty assessment; coronal restorations; OHIP-14; procedural errors; recipro-cating WaveOne files

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the clinical and radiographic outcomes at least 4 years after root canal treatment (RCT) and evaluated patients' perceived oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). The results showed high success rates in both clinical and radiographic aspects of RCT. However, patients with difficult cases and technical mishaps experienced more clinical symptoms. Clinical symptoms were found to be related to patients' OHRQoL.
Introduction: Root canal treatment (RCT) is often considered a difficult procedure for both the patient and treatment provider. The American Association of Endodontists case difficulty assessment form categorizes cases as minimal, moderate, and high difficulty level. We recently showed that endodontic mishaps occur frequently during treatment of teeth in high difficulty category. The aims were to investigate the clinical and radiographic outcome at least 4 years after RCT and to evaluate patients' perceived oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). Methods: Two hundred thirty-four patients (257 endodontically treated teeth) who were previously included in a quality assurance study were offered a recall appointment at the Department of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Norway. Patients were given a thorough clinical, radiographic examination and asked to fill out the Oral Health Impact Profile -14 questionnaire. Results: A total of 149 patients (160 teeth) attended the 4-year (range, 4- 6 years) recall appointment. An unchanged or lower Periapical Index (PAI) score at recall visit was registered on 153 teeth (95.6%) (P < .001). Radiographic success rate (PAI score < 2) was 87.5%, and clinical success (absence of clinical signs and symptoms) was 88.8%. Both radiographic and clinical success was observed in 78.8% of teeth. Teeth in high difficulty category, instrumented with engine-driven files, and molars presented with significantly more clinical signs and symptoms but not high PAI score (PAI score > 3) (P < .05). Endodontic mishaps such as overinstrumentation and overfill with gutta-percha resulted in significantly high PAI score (P < .05). Patients with no clinical signs and symptoms after RCT and elderly had a significantly better OHRQoL (P < .05). Conclusions: Presence of clinical signs and symptoms rather than PAI score affected patients' OHRQoL. (J Endod 2023;49:382-389.)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available