4.3 Article

Options for Dynamic Similarity of Interacting Fluids, Elastic Solids and Rigid Bodies Undergoing Large Motions

Journal

JOURNAL OF ELASTICITY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10659-022-09972-7

Keywords

Dynamic similarity; Scaling laws; Fluid-structure interaction; Wind turbines; Material selection; Continuum mechanics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by a design of a vertical axis wind turbine, this paper presents a theory of dynamical similarity for mechanical systems consisting of interacting elastic solids, rigid bodies, and incompressible fluids in the geometrically nonlinear case. It analyzes the equations of motion and identifies numerous cases, especially for stiff nonlinear elastic materials, that have not been previously identified. These results are particularly applicable to structures made with origami design methods, where isometric deformation of tiles is allowed. The findings are summarized in tables, and some specific numerical examples are discussed.
Motivated by a design of a vertical axis wind turbine, we present a theory of dynamical similarity for mechanical systems consisting of interacting elastic solids, rigid bodies and incompressible fluids. Throughout, we focus on the geometrically nonlinear case. We approach the analysis by analyzing the equations of motion: we ask that a change of variables take these equations and mutual boundary conditions to themselves, while allowing a rescaling of space and time. While the disparity between the Eulerian and Lagrangian descriptions might seem to limit the possibilities, we find numerous cases that apparently have not been identified, especially for stiff nonlinear elastic materials (defined below). The results appear to be particularly adapted to structures made with origami design methods, where the tiles are allowed to deform isometrically. We collect the results in tables and discuss some particular numerical examples.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available