4.6 Article

Constraining scale dependent growth with redshift surveys

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/029

Keywords

galaxy clustering; modified gravity; redshift surveys

Funding

  1. Energetic Cosmos Laboratory
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-05CH11231]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Redshift surveys have the potential to accurately measure the growth rate of large scale structure, providing important clues to cosmology. A model-independent approach is proposed to match scalar-tensor results, with promising applications for future data. The combination of low redshift peculiar velocity data and redshift space distortion measurements can significantly improve the accuracy.
Ongoing and future redshift surveys have the capability to measure the growth rate of large scale structure at the percent level over a broad range of redshifts, tightly constraining cosmological parameters. Beyond general relativity, however, the growth rate in the linear density perturbation regime can be not only redshift dependent but scale dependent, revealing important clues to modified gravity. We demonstrate that a fully model independent approach of binning the gravitational strength Geff( k, z) matches scalar-tensor results for the growth rate f sigma(8)( k, z) to 0.02%-0.27% rms accuracy. For data of the quality of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) we find the bin values can be constrained to 1.4%-28%. We also explore the general scalar-tensor form, constraining the amplitude and past and future scalaron mass/shape parameters. Perhaps most interesting is the strong complementarity of low redshift peculiar velocity data with DESI-like redshift space distortion measurements, enabling improvements up to a factor 6-7 on 2D joint confidence contour areas. Finally, we quantify some issues with gravity parametrizations that do not include all the key physics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available