4.6 Article

Analytical study of gravitational lensing in Kerr-Newman black-bounce spacetime

Journal

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1475-7516/2022/11/006

Keywords

gravitational lensing; gravity

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology Science and Engineering Research Board (India) [MTR/2021/000490, SRG/2020/001380]
  2. Board Of Research In Nuclear Sciences (BRNS), Department of atomic Energy, India [202011BRE03RP06633-BRNS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the equatorial deflection angle of light rays in KerrNewman black-bounce spacetime and derives a closed-form formula for this deflection angle in terms of elliptic integrals. The results show that the deflection angle increases with the decrease of charge and regularization parameter, while the effect of the regularization parameter on the ring size is negligible.
We investigate the equatorial deflection angle of light rays propagating in KerrNewman black-bounce spacetime. Furthermore, we analyze the light ray trajectories and derive a closed-form formula for deflection angle in terms of elliptic integrals. The deflection angle increases with the decrease of charge and regularisation parameter for a particular impact parameter. We also study the strong field limit of the deflection angle. Using this strong deflection angle formula and lens equation, we find the radius of the first Einstein ring and study its dependence on the charge and the regularisation parameter. We demonstrate that the charge has a robust effect on the size of the Einstein rings, but the effect of the regularization parameter on the ring size is negligible. We also investigate the non-equatorial lensing and the caustic structures for small polar inclination, and the same observations appear to hold. These results directly affect the observational appearance of the Kerr-Newman black-bounce.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available