4.7 Article

10-30-Day Subseasonal Features Associated with Multiple and Isolated Persistent Rainfall Events over South China

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLIMATE
Volume 36, Issue 9, Pages 3129-3143

Publisher

AMER METEOROLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1175/JCLI-D-22-0715.1

Keywords

Advection; Rainfall; Angular momentum; Extreme events; Moisture; moisture budget; Intraseasonal variability

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compares and analyzes the spatiotemporal structures of the 10-30-day intraseasonal oscillations associated with multiple persistent rainfall (MPR) and isolated persistent rainfall (IPR) over South China. The results show that the leading phase of low-level moisture and air temperature perturbations is always before the anomalous precipitation. The moisture budget analysis reveals that the difference in moisture tendency between MPR and IPR is mainly due to meridional advection, influenced by higher-latitude disturbances. The low-level temperature anomalies are not the key factor causing the difference between MPR and IPR.
In this study, persistent rainfall (PR) over South China (SC) is divided into two types. One type occurs multiple times in succession [defined as multiple PR (MPR)]; another type represents isolated PR (IPR), for which no new PR occurs for 10 days after the previous PR. The spatiotemporal structures of the 10-30-day intraseasonal oscillations (ISOs) associated with the two types of PR are compared and analyzed. The results reveal that the low-level moisture and air temperature perturbations always have a leading phase relative to the anomalous precipitation. In addition, the positive low-level moisture tendency appears in the MPR ending phase, whereas that in the IPR is close to zero. This difference results in convective development after the MPR ending phase, though not after the IPR. The moisture budget shows that the difference in moisture tendency between MPR and IPR is mainly due to meridional advection, including advections by the mean meridional flow across the perturbation moisture gradient and by the perturbation meridional flow across the mean moisture gradient. For the former, the difference is attributed to the perturbation moisture gradients, while the mean moisture gradients are responsible for the difference of the latter. Furthermore, an essential cause of the difference is the influence of higher-latitude disturbances that affect the IPR more significantly than the MPR. Two associated mechanisms are proposed. One is the perturbation stacking effect, and the other is the effect of angular momentum conservation. By contrast, the low-level temperature anomalies are not the key factor causing the difference between MPR and IPR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available