4.7 Article

Potential energy savings benefits and limitations of radiative cooling coatings for US residential buildings

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 379, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134763

Keywords

Radiative cooling; Cool roof; Roof coating; Buildings; Energy savings

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-AC36- 08GO28308]
  2. Wells Fargo Innovation Incubator - Wells Fargo Foundation
  3. NREL

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the benefits and limitations of implementing radiative coatings on the building envelope of residential buildings in the United States. The analysis compares the performance of ideal and realistic radiative coatings and shows that energy savings differ based on geographical location and climate conditions.
Radiative coatings are a promising strategy to implement passive cooling that provides an eco-friendly pathway to achieve energy efficiency in buildings. This study investigates the benefits and limitations of implementing radiative coatings on the building envelope, particularly the roof, of residential buildings in the United States. The analysis compares the performance of an ideal radiative coating with broadband surface properties to a realistic radiative coating with diffuse and semitransparent properties. To enhance the net energy efficiency of buildings, we carried out a comprehensive parametric analysis comprising key radiation surface properties to maximize cooling energy savings while minimizing heating energy penalties. A countrywide assessment for 68 locations across the United States showed that net energy savings are a strong function of the climatic and at-mospheric conditions. Broadly, southern locations showed high overall energy savings whereas northern loca-tions exhibited high overall energy penalties. Locations in International Energy Conservation Code (IECC) climate zones 1A, 2A, and 2B showed a net annual energy savings above 5%, whereas locations in IECC climate zones 5B, 6B, and 7 showed a net annual energy penalty greater than 3%. The hot and dry climate of Phoenix, Arizona, showed the highest overall energy savings of 426 kWh (6.2%). Additionally, the mathematical corre-lation reveals that the net energy savings of a location is positive only when its average cooling degree days is greater than 5.5 or its average heating degree days is less than 10.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available