4.7 Article

Clathrin coats partially preassemble and subsequently bend during endocytosis

Journal

JOURNAL OF CELL BIOLOGY
Volume 222, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

ROCKEFELLER UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.202206038

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals the three-dimensional shapes of clathrin coats during endocytosis and introduces a novel Cooperative Curvature Model that accurately describes the changes in shapes and dynamics. The findings provide insights into the mechanism of clathrin coat remodeling during endocytosis and offer a potential general model for clathrin coat remodeling on the plasma membrane.
Mund and Tschanz et al. reveal the three-dimensional shapes of clathrin coats during endocytosis, which partially preassemble and then bend progressively. They further introduce the novel Cooperative Curvature Model, which accurately describes the changes in shapes and dynamics during endocytic clathrin remodeling. Eukaryotic cells use clathrin-mediated endocytosis to take up a large range of extracellular cargo. During endocytosis, a clathrin coat forms on the plasma membrane, but it remains controversial when and how it is remodeled into a spherical vesicle. Here, we use 3D superresolution microscopy to determine the precise geometry of the clathrin coat at large numbers of endocytic sites. Through pseudo-temporal sorting, we determine the average trajectory of clathrin remodeling during endocytosis. We find that clathrin coats assemble first on flat membranes to 50% of the coat area before they become rapidly and continuously bent, and this mechanism is confirmed in three cell lines. We introduce the cooperative curvature model, which is based on positive feedback for curvature generation. It accurately describes the measured shapes and dynamics of the clathrin coat and could represent a general mechanism for clathrin coat remodeling on the plasma membrane.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available