4.4 Article

Enhanced production of fibrous bacterial cellulose in Gluconacetobacter xylinus culture medium containing modified protein of okara waste

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOSCIENCE AND BIOENGINEERING
Volume 135, Issue 1, Pages 71-78

Publisher

SOC BIOSCIENCE BIOENGINEERING JAPAN
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2022.10.007

Keywords

[ Bacterial cellulose; Nanocellulose; Biosynthesis; Waste; Soybean residue]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In Gluconacetobacter xylinus cultivation, agro-industrial wastes, such as soybean residual okara, okara extracted protein, and modified okara protein, were used as a protein source to enhance bacterial nanocellulose production. Acetic-acid modified protein showed improved solubility and smaller particle size, resulting in higher cellulose yield. The utilization of okara waste provided enhanced economic feasibility and sustainability in nanocellulose production.
In Gluconacetobacter xylinus cultivation for bacterial nanocellulose production, agro-industrial wastes, soybean residual okara, okara extracted protein, and modified okara protein, were used as a protein source. In comparison with homogenized raw okara and protein extracted from raw okara, acetic-acid modified protein provided the higher cellulose yield (2.8 g/l at 3 %w/v protein concentration) due to the improved protein solubility in the culture medium (89 %) and smaller particle size (0.2 mm) leading to facile uptake by the bacteria. Importantly, pH of the culture medium containing the modified protein measured before and after the cultivation was similar, suggesting the buffering capacity of the protein. Nanocellulose fibers were then produced densely in the network of hydrogels with high crystallinity nearly 90 %. Based on the results, economic constraints around nanocellulose production could be alleviated by valorization of okara waste, which provided enhanced sustainability. (c) 2022, The Society for Biotechnology, Japan. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available