4.6 Article

Optimizing the classification of biological tissues using machine learning models based on polarized data

Journal

JOURNAL OF BIOPHOTONICS
Volume 16, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/jbio.202200308

Keywords

biological tissues; biophotonics; machine learning; polarimetry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Polarimetric data is used to build recognition models for organic tissues or early disease detection. Different polarimetric observables are proposed in literature, obtained through mathematical transformations of the Mueller matrix. In this study, 12 classification models based on different polarimetric datasets are compared, highlighting the importance of using raw Mueller matrix elements for classification models design.
Polarimetric data is nowadays used to build recognition models for the characterization of organic tissues or the early detection of some diseases. Different Mueller matrix-derived polarimetric observables, which allow a physical interpretation of a specific characteristic of samples, are proposed in literature to feed the required recognition algorithms. However, they are obtained through mathematical transformations of the Mueller matrix and this process may loss relevant sample information in search of physical interpretation. In this work, we present a thorough comparative between 12 classification models based on different polarimetric datasets to find the ideal polarimetric framework to construct tissues classification models. The study is conducted on the experimental Mueller matrices images measured on different tissues: muscle, tendon, myotendinous junction and bone; from a collection of 165 ex-vivo chicken thighs. Three polarimetric datasets are analyzed: (A) a selection of most representative metrics presented in literature; (B) Mueller matrix elements; and (C) the combination of (A) and (B) sets. Results highlight the importance of using raw Mueller matrix elements for the design of classification models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available