4.3 Article

Question Format Matters: Do Athletes Really Know the Signs and Symptoms of a Sport-Related Concussion?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ATHLETIC TRAINING
Volume 58, Issue 6, Pages 573-578

Publisher

NATL ATHLETIC TRAINERS ASSOC INC
DOI: 10.4085/1062-6050-0233.22

Keywords

injury awareness; concussion identification; health literacy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Authors commonly used a multiselect checklist method to assess athletes' ability to recognize sport-related concussion signs and symptoms, but this may overestimate their knowledge. This study found that athletes with previous exposure to concussion education and a history of diagnosed concussion had a greater understanding of concussion signs and symptoms. Researchers and clinicians should be aware of the difference between recognition and free recall question formats when assessing concussion knowledge and managing athletes with suspected concussion.
Authors of previous studies commonly used a multiselect checklist method to assess an athlete's ability to recognize true sport-related concussion (SRC) signs and symptoms (S&S) among incorrect distractor options. However, this may overinflate the evaluation of participants' knowledge because the multiselect method does not test athletes' ability to retrieve knowledge from their long-term memory. To examine this hypothesis, we sent an online survey to registered members of the Japan Lacrosse Association (n = 8530) to assess differences in reported SRC S&S by open-ended-question and multiselect formats. We also evaluated whether previous exposure to SRC education and a history of SRC influenced athletes' SRC S&S knowledge. The numbers and proportions of responses were calculated using descriptive statistics. The Pearson correlation was calculated to analyze the relationship between scores from the 2 question formats. Unpaired-samples t tests were conducted to compare the mean scores for each question format by previous SRC education and history of diagnosed SRC. Odds ratios were computed to express the relationship between the proportion of correct answers by question format per symptom. The response rate of the survey was 35.9% (n = 3065), and scores from the 2 question formats were correlated (r = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.31, 0.37; P , .001). For both question formats, athletes with previous exposure to SRC education and a history of SRC had a greater number of correct answers; however, the mean differences were trivial. Researchers and clinicians should acknowledge the difference between multiselect (recognition) and open-ended (free recall) formats when assessing one's understanding of SRC and managing athletes with a suspected SRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available