4.6 Article

Influence of magnetic casting on the permeability and anti-fouling properties of a novel iron oxide/alumina/polysulfone mixed matrix membrane

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 140, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.53370

Keywords

Al2O3 nanoparticles; Fe3O4; magnetic casting; magnetic nanocomposite membranes; PSf membranes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Novel mixed matrix membranes were prepared using magnetic casting and nanocomposite technology, resulting in increased water flux and improved anti-fouling properties.
Novel mixed matrix membranes (MMMs) were fabricated using Fe3O4, and Al2O3 nanoparticles (NPs) were added to the polysulfone (PSf) and N-methylpyrrolidone (NMP) solution. The nanocomposite membranes were fabricated using the NIPS (non-solvent induced phase separation) method. In order to create preferential permeation pathways for water across the MMMs, membrane formation is accomplished with an external magnetic field. Using magnetic casting cause the targeted placement of NPs in the best location and orientation. The performance of the prepared membranes was examined in terms of pure water flux and fouling parameters. Magnetic casting considerably increased pure water flux and decreased the total resistance of the optimum mixed matrix membrane, which contains 0.2% wt. of Fe3O4 NPs to 1175 L/m(2)h and 13.4 * 10(11) (m(-1)), respectively. This is explained by the ordering of magnetic nanoparticles on the membrane sub-layer cast under the magnetic field of 500 mT, which changed the sub-layer structure. Less rough membrane surface of the mixed matrix membranes offered preferable anti-fouling properties against fouling by BSA proteins. The characterization of fabricated membranes was carried out using field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), energy dispersive X-ray (EDX), and water contact angle measurement methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available