4.6 Article

Improve the interfacial properties of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy resin composites by maleimide-modified waterborne polyurethane sizing agent

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED POLYMER SCIENCE
Volume 140, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/app.53611

Keywords

carbon fibers; cure; fiber; matrix bond; mechanical properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) maleimide (4-HPM) modified waterborne polyurethane emulsions (MWPU) were used as surface sizing agents to improve the interfacial adhesion between carbon fibers (CF) and epoxy resin matrix. The modified MWPU showed good particle size distribution, storage stability, and thermal stability. The surface reactivity of CF increased significantly after sizing. The interfacial shear strength (IFSS) and the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) of CFREs were greatly improved by the MWPU emulsion, especially when the 4-HPM content was 1.0 wt%.
The N-(4-hydroxyphenyl) maleimide (4-HPM) modified waterborne polyurethane emulsions (MWPU) were used as surface sizing agents to improve the interfacial adhesion between carbon fibers (CF) and epoxy resin matrix. Dynamic light scattering (DLS), transmission electron microscope (TEM), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) showed the particle size distribution, storage stability, and thermal stability of the modified MWPU. And the surface reactivity of CF increased significantly after sizing. The interfacial shear strength (IFSS) and the interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) of CFREs were tested, and the fracture morphology was observed. The result showed that a continuous and uniform sizing layer is formed on the surface of CF. In particular, the comprehensive performance and interfacial modification effect of the MWPU emulsion outperformed other samples when the 4-HPM content was 1.0 wt%. Compared with unsized carbon fibers, the IFSS and ILSS are up to 71.30% and 30.81% higher, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available