4.6 Article

Band alignment of sputtered and atomic layer deposited SiO2 and Al2O3 on ScAlN

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS
Volume 132, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0131766

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of the Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA1-20-2-0002]
  2. National Science Foundation [DMR 1856662]
  3. Naval Research Office [N00014-19-1-2225]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The band alignments of SiO2 and Al2O3, two potential dielectric materials for ScAlN, were investigated using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The deposition method was found to significantly affect the valence band offsets of SiO2 and Al2O3 films on ScAlN, indicating their potential as gate dielectrics for transistor structures.
The band alignments of two candidate dielectrics for ScAlN, namely, SiO2 and Al2O2, were obtained by x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. We compared the effect of deposition method on the valence band offsets of both sputtered and atomic layer deposition films of SiO2 and Al2O3 on Sc0.27Al0.73 N (bandgap 5.1 eV) films. The band alignments are type I (straddled gap) for SiO2 and type II (staggered gap) for Al2O3. The deposition methods make a large difference in relative valence band offsets, in the range 0.4-0.5 eV for both SiO2 and Al2O3. The absolute valence band offsets were 2.1 or 2.6 eV for SiO2 and 1.5 or 1.9 eV for Al2O3 on ScAlN. Conduction band offsets derived from these valence band offsets, and the measured bandgaps were then in the range 1.0-1.1 eV for SiO2 and 0.30-0.70 eV for Al2O3. These latter differences can be partially ascribed to changes in bandgap for the case of SiO2 deposited by the two different methods, but not for Al2O3, where the bandgap as independent of deposition method. Since both dielectrics can be selectively removed from ScAlN, they are promising as gate dielectrics for transistor structures. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available