4.7 Article

Enhancement of lithium argyrodite interface stability through MoO2 substitution and its application in lithium solid state batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 925, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166596

Keywords

Lithium argyrodites; Ionic conductivity; Electrochemical performances; Solid-state battery

Funding

  1. University of Ulsan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study improved the interface stability of Li-argyrodites through metal and oxygen substitution, and evaluated their structural and electrochemical performances. The results showed that MoO2 substitution can enhance critical current density and ionic conductivity.
A recently developed sulfide solid electrolyte in lithium solid-state batteries has a low critical current density, which can cause battery failure. Therefore, the metal oxide substitution in the Li-argyrodite structure was considered as a strategy to enhance the interface stability. In this work, the interface stability of the Li-argyrodites was improved using metal and oxygen substitution in the P-and S-sites of the Li6PS5Cl structure; furthermore, their structural and electrochemical performances were evaluated. For this study, the MoO2 substituted argyrodite (0 & LE; x & LE; 0.2) was synthesized using a high-energy ball-milling process. Structural analysis revealed that impurity phases occurred when x was over 0.05; this indicated the so-lubility limit of the metal oxide substitution. The ionic conductivity analysis demonstrated that Li6PS5Cl-MoO2-0.05 electrolyte maintained an ionic conductivity of 4.16 mS cm-1. Additionally, the Li6PS5Cl-MoO2- 0.05 composition exhibited a higher critical current density (0.55 mA cm-2) than that of Li6PS5Cl (0.20 mA cm-2). It should be further noted that the electrochemical performances were examined against lithium as a reference.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available