4.7 Review

Lean Production Systems 4.0: systematic literature review and field study on the digital transformation of lean methods and tools

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 24, Pages 8751-8773

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2159562

Keywords

Lean production system; Lean Production System 4; 0; production system; lean production; Industrie 4; digital transformation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lean Production Systems are frameworks that continuously adjust enterprise processes to meet customer needs and achieve overall objectives. Designing Lean Production Systems 4.0 is a challenging task due to the complexity of digital transformation. Through a systematic literature review and field study, 10 guidelines for the design of future Lean Production Systems 4.0 were derived.
Lean Production Systems are enterprise-specific, methodical frameworks for the continuous orientation of all enterprise processes to the customer in order to achieve overall objectives. Due to an increasing complexity of the digital transformation, the design of Lean Production Systems 4.0 is a challenging task for industrial engineering practice. For this, academia and industrial practice were analysed in a combined approach of a systematic literature review and a field study. The systematic literature review of 62 out of 1600 scientific papers shows that especially the tools, processes, and methods in Lean Production Systems are subject to digital transformation. By involving industrial practice in a field study, quantitative and qualitative insights were used to check scientific hypotheses and identify practical requirements by industrial engineers. As a result, 10 guidelines for the design of future Lean Production Systems 4.0 are derived. The practical implications of this paper enhance the evolution of enterprise-specific Lean Production System 4.0 frameworks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available