4.5 Article

Effects of hydrostatic preload on strain hardening and strain aging of boiler tubes

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2022.104806

Keywords

Boiler tubes; Weld defects; Strain hardening; Strain aging; Dislocations

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tests were conducted to investigate the effects of existing defects on strain hardening and strain aging of boiler tubes. The local plastic strain near the pre-existing defects was quantified using electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and finite element analysis (FEA). It was found that the strain hardening and strain aging effects depend on the degree of plastic deformation. It is recommended to maintain the hydrostatic pressure near 110% of the maximum allowable operating pressure (MAWP) in order to prevent significant alteration of mechanical properties at stress concentration points in boiler membranes containing defects.
Tests were conducted to identify the effects of existing defects on strain hardening and strain aging of boiler tubes. Electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) and finite element analysis (FEA) were used to quantify the local plastic strain near the pre-existing defects. Strain hardening and strain aging effects depend on the degree of plastic deformation. Any existing defects in the boiler tubes can act as stress raisers during the room temperature hydrostatic test. For the morphology and orientations of the defects, a preload of 95 MPa which is equivalent to the hydrostatic test pressure was enough to induce local plasticity. When heated to boiler service temperature and tested to fracture, the mechanical properties of boiler tubes were affected. The test results justify a recommendation that the hydrostatic pressure to be kept near 110% of maximum allowable operating pressure (MAWP) to avoid significant alteration of mechanical properties at stress concentration points in defect-containing boiler membranes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available