4.7 Article

Effect of Water Vapor on Oxidation Processes of the Cu(111) Surface and Sublayer

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010810

Keywords

oxidation reaction; copper; copper oxide; water; near-ambient techniques; operando observation; surface chemistry

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The catalytic properties of copper-based catalysts depend on the oxidation states of Cu. This study utilized near-ambient pressure scanning tunneling microscopy (NAP-STM) and near-ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (NAP-XPS) to observe the oxidation processes of Cu(111) in real time. Dry oxidation started at the step edges and proceeded to the terraces as a Cu2O phase, while humid oxidation showed Cu2O generation at upper steps. The difference in oxidation mechanisms was attributed to the presence of water molecules.
Copper-based catalysts have different catalytic properties depending on the oxidation states of Cu. We report operando observations of the Cu(111) oxidation processes using near-ambient pressure scanning tunneling microscopy (NAP-STM) and near-ambient pressure X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (NAP-XPS). The Cu(111) surface was chemically inactive to water vapor, but only physisorption of water molecules was observed by NAP-STM. Under O-2 environments, dry oxidation started at the step edges and proceeded to the terraces as a Cu2O phase. Humid oxidation of the H2O/O-2 gas mixture was also promoted at the step edges to the terraces. After the Cu2O covered the surface under humid conditions, hydroxides and adsorbed water layers formed. NAP-STM observations showed that Cu2O was generated at lower steps in dry oxidation with independent terrace oxidations, whereas Cu2O was generated at upper steps in humid oxidation. The difference in the oxidation mechanisms was caused by water molecules. When the surface was entirely oxidized, the diffusion of Cu and O atoms with a reconstruction of the Cu2O structures induced additional subsurface oxidation. NAP-XPS measurements showed that the Cu2O thickness in dry oxidation was greater than that in humid oxidation under all pressure conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available