4.7 Article

Nebulized Menthol Impairs Mucociliary Clearance via TRPM8 and MUC5AC/MUC5B in Primary Airway Epithelial Cells

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24021694

Keywords

TRPM8; menthol; MUC5AC; MUC5B; airway epithelium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flavorings, such as menthol, in e-cigarettes can affect the clearance of mucus in the airways, potentially leading to harm. Menthol at high concentrations used in e-cigs can decrease ciliary beat frequency, reduce airway surface liquid volume, and increase mucus concentrations, resulting in impaired mucociliary clearance and increased inflammation.
Flavorings enhance the palatability of e-cigarettes (e-cigs), with menthol remaining a popular choice among e-cig users. Menthol flavor remains one of the only flavors approved by the United States FDA for use in commercially available, pod-based e-cigs. However, the safety of inhaled menthol at the high concentrations used in e-cigs remains unclear. Here, we tested the effects of menthol on parameters of mucociliary clearance (MCC) in air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures of primary airway epithelial cells. ALI cultures treated with basolateral menthol (1 mM) showed a significant decrease in ciliary beat frequency (CBF) and airway surface liquid (ASL) volumes after 24 h. Menthol nebulized onto the surface of ALI cultures similarly reduced CBF and increased mucus concentrations, resulting in decreased rates of mucociliary transport. Nebulized menthol further increased the expression of mucin 5AC (MUC5AC) and mRNA expression of the inflammatory cytokines IL1B and TNFA. Menthol activated TRPM8, and the effects of menthol on MCC and inflammation could be blocked by a specific TRPM8 antagonist. These data provide further evidence that menthol at the concentrations used in e-cigs could cause harm to the airways.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available