4.7 Article

Degradation of the Selected Antibiotic in an Aqueous Solution by the Fenton Process: Kinetics, Products and Ecotoxicity

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415676

Keywords

Fenton reaction; sulfonamides; kinetics; toxicity; degradation products

Funding

  1. Medical University of Silesia [PCN-1-030/N/2/F, PCN-1-035/N/2/F]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study focused on the degradation of sulfonamides used in veterinary medicine through the Fenton process, showing that UVa irradiation can enhance reaction efficiency. Furthermore, it was found that increasing the dose of H2O2 may lead to an increase in the ecotoxicity of the post-reaction mixture.
Sulfonamides used in veterinary medicine can be degraded via the Fenton processes. In the premise, the process should also remove the antimicrobial activity of wastewater containing antibiotics. The kinetics of sulfathiazole degradation and identification of the degradation products were investigated in the experiments. In addition, their toxicity against Vibrio fischeri, the MARA (R) assay, and unselected microorganisms from a wastewater treatment plant and the river was evaluated. It was found that in the Fenton process, the sulfathiazole degradation was described by the following kinetic equation: r(0) = k C-STZ(-1 or 0) C-Fe(II)(3) C-H2O2(0 or 1) C-TOC(-2), where r(0) is the initial reaction rate, k is the reaction rate constant, C is the concentration of sulfathiazole, Fe(II) ions, hydrogen peroxide and total organic carbon, respectively. The reaction efficiency and the useful pH range (up to pH 5) could be increased by UVa irradiation of the reaction mixture. Eighteen organic degradation products of sulfathiazole were detected and identified, and a possible degradation mechanism was proposed. An increase in the H2O2 dose, to obtain a high degree of mineralization of sulfonamide, resulted in an increase in the ecotoxicity of the post-reaction mixture.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available