4.7 Review

New Therapeutics for Extracellular Vesicles: Delivering CRISPR for Cancer Treatment

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415758

Keywords

extracellular vesicles; CRISPR; cancer; exosome; gene editing; gene therapy; Cas9

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been recognized as superior vectors for drug or gene delivery, and recent studies have highlighted their importance in CRISPR gene editing, especially in cancer treatment. This review discusses the strategies and limitations of constructing EV-CRISPR vectors, and emphasizes the clinical potential of engineered EVs in cancer therapy.
Cancers are defined by genetic defects, which underlines the prospect of using gene therapy in patient care. During the past decade, CRISPR technology has rapidly evolved into a powerful gene editing tool with high fidelity and precision. However, one of the impediments slowing down the clinical translation of CRISPR-based gene therapy concerns the lack of ideal delivery vectors. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nano-sized membrane sacs naturally released from nearly all types of cells. Although EVs are secreted for bio-information conveyance among cells or tissues, they have been recognized as superior vectors for drug or gene delivery. Recently, emerging evidence has spotlighted EVs in CRISPR delivery towards cancer treatment. In this review, we briefly introduce the biology and function of the CRISPR system and follow this with a summary of current delivery methods for CRISPR applications. We emphasize the recent progress in EV-mediated CRISPR editing for various cancer types and target genes. The reported strategies for constructing EV-CRISPR vectors, as well as their limitations, are discussed in detail. The review aims to throw light on the clinical potential of engineered EVs and encourage the expansion of our available toolkit to defeat cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available