4.7 Article

Increased Expression of Galectin-3 in Skin Fibrosis: Evidence from In Vitro and In Vivo Studies

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232315319

Keywords

Galectin-3; skin; fibrosis

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion
  2. Agencia Estatal de Investigacion, Instituto de Salud Carlos III FIS
  3. CIBERES group
  4. Spanish Government
  5. Generalitat Valenciana
  6. [PID2020-114871RB-I00]
  7. [CB06/06/0027]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the role of GAL-3 in skin fibrosis and demonstrates its significantly increased expression using various models and techniques.
Skin fibrosis is a hallmark of a wide array of dermatological diseases which can greatly impact the patients' quality of life. Galectin-3 (GAL-3) has emerged as a central regulator of tissue fibrosis, playing an important pro-fibrotic role in numerous organs. Various studies are highlighting its importance as a skin fibrotic diseases biomarker; however, there is a need for further studies that clarify its role. This paper aims to ascertain whether the expression of GAL-3 is increased in relevant in vitro and in vivo models of skin fibrosis. We studied the role of GAL-3 in vitro using normal human dermal fibroblasts (NHDF) and fibrocytes. In addition, we used a skin fibrosis murine model (BALB/c mice) and human biopsies of healthy or keloid tissue. GAL-3 expression was analyzed using real time PCR, Western blot and immunostaining techniques. We report a significantly increased expression of GAL-3 in NHDF and fibrocytes cell cultures following stimulation with transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF beta 1). In vivo, GAL-3 expression was increased in a murine model of systemic sclerosis and in human keloid biopsies. In sum, this study underlines the involvement of GAL-3 in skin fibrosis using several models of the disease and highlights its role as a relevant target.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available