4.7 Article

Molecular Characterization of the Dual Effect of the GPER Agonist G-1 in Glioblastoma

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232214309

Keywords

glioma; GPER agonist G-1; transcriptomic analysis; lipid metabolism; tubulin inhibitor; xenograft

Funding

  1. Canceropole Grand Est
  2. University of Lorraine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glioblastoma is a common primary brain tumor with poor treatment outcomes. High expression of GPER1 is associated with better survival, suggesting the protective role of estrogen signaling. The G-1 agonist demonstrates anti-tumor effects on GBM.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor in adults. Despite conventional treatment, consisting of a chirurgical resection followed by concomitant radio-chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate is less than 5%. Few risk factors are clearly identified, but women are 1.4-fold less affected than men, suggesting that hormone and particularly estrogen signaling could have protective properties. Indeed, a high GPER1 (G-protein-coupled estrogen receptor) expression is associated with better survival, especially in women who produce a greater amount of estrogen. Therefore, we addressed the anti-tumor effect of the GPER agonist G-1 in vivo and characterized its molecular mechanism of action in vitro. First, the antiproliferative effect of G-1 was confirmed in a model of xenografted nude mice. A transcriptome analysis of GBM cells exposed to G-1 was performed, followed by functional analysis of the differentially expressed genes. Lipid and steroid synthesis pathways as well as cell division processes were both affected by G-1, depending on the dose and duration of the treatment. ANGPTL4, the first marker of G-1 exposure in GBM, was identified and validated in primary GBM cells and patient samples. These data strongly support the potential of G-1 as a promising chemotherapeutic compound for the treatment of GBM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available