4.7 Article

Decreased Expression of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Suppresses Murine Choroidal Neovascularization

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms232415595

Keywords

adenoassociated viral vector; choroidal neovascularization; neovascular age-related macular degeneration; RNAscope; soluble epoxide hydrolase

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study validates soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) as a potential therapeutic target for choroidal neovascularization (CNV) associated with wet age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Knockdown of the sEH gene significantly reduces CNV and normalizes the expression levels of CNV-related inflammatory markers.
Neovascular or wet age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) is a leading cause of blindness among older adults. Choroidal neovascularization (CNV) is a major pathological feature of nAMD, in which abnormal new blood vessel growth from the choroid leads to irreversible vision loss. There is a critical need to develop novel therapeutic strategies to address limitations of the current anti-vascular endothelial growth factor biologics. Previously, we identified soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH) as a possible therapeutic target for CNV through a forward chemical genetic approach. The purpose of this study was to validate sEH as a target by examining retinal expression of sEH protein and mRNA by immunohistochemistry and RNAscope in situ hybridization, respectively, and to assess the efficacy of an adeno-associated virus (AAV) vector designed to knock down the sEH gene, Ephx2, in the murine laser-induced (L-) CNV model. nAMD patient postmortem eye tissue and murine L-CNV showed overexpression of sEH in photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelial cells. Ephx2 knockdown significantly reduced CNV and normalized mRNA expression levels of CNV-related inflammatory markers. Thus, this study further establishes sEH as a promising therapeutic target against CNV associated with nAMD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available