4.7 Article

Genetic Mapping of Behavioral Traits Using the Collaborative Cross Resource

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24010682

Keywords

collaborative cross mice; behavioral genetics; QTL mapping; high precision

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The complicated interactions between genetic background, environment, and lifestyle factors make it difficult to study the genetic basis of complex phenotypes in humans. Mouse studies offer the advantage of tight control over environmental and other factors. The Collaborative Cross (CC), a mouse genetic reference population, was used to assess behavioral measures associated with various traits. The study identified genetic variants underlying these traits and highlighted the potential of the CC population in behavioral genetic research.
The complicated interactions between genetic background, environment and lifestyle factors make it difficult to study the genetic basis of complex phenotypes, such as cognition and anxiety levels, in humans. However, environmental and other factors can be tightly controlled in mouse studies. The Collaborative Cross (CC) is a mouse genetic reference population whose common genetic and phenotypic diversity is on par with that of humans. Therefore, we leveraged the power of the CC to assess 52 behavioral measures associated with locomotor activity, anxiety level, learning and memory. This is the first application of the CC in novel object recognition tests, Morris water maze tasks, and fear conditioning tests. We found substantial continuous behavioral variations across the CC strains tested, and mapped six quantitative trait loci (QTLs) which influenced these traits, defining candidate genetic variants underlying these QTLs. Overall, our findings highlight the potential of the CC population in behavioral genetic research, while the identified genomic loci and genes driving the variation of relevant behavioral traits provide a foundation for further studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available