One-year results of the ICON (ionic versus non-ionic contrast to obviate worsening nephropathy after angioplasty in chronic renal failure patients) Study

BackgroundLong-term clinical outcomes after exposure to non-ionic iso-osmolar contrast medium (IOCM) or ionic low-osmolar CM (LOCM) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing coronary angiography are unclear. MethodsThe ICON trial was a prospective, double-blinded, multicentre study that randomly assigned 146 patients with CKD undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention to the non-ionic IOCM Iodixanol or the ionic LOCM Ioxaglate. We report the 1-year clinical outcomes. ResultsAfter randomization, baseline and procedural characteristics were well-matched between the two groups. At 1 year, three deaths (4.1%) occurred in the ioxaglate and nine deaths in the iodixanol group (13.6%, P=0.07). The cardiac death rate at 1 year was 2.7% in the ioxaglate group and 9.1% in the iodixanol group (P=0.07). There were no significant differences in the rates of myocardial infarction (1.4% vs. 1.5%; P=1.00) and repeated revascularization (6.8% vs. 9.1%; P=0.75). ConclusionsThe use of ionic LOCM ioxaglate was associated with a numerically lower mortality at 1 year as compared to iodixanol in patients who underwent cardiac catheterization. Future studies evaluating long-term safety following exposure to different types of CM are warranted. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.