4.5 Article

Direct numerical simulation of turbulent pipe flow by large-scale control using buoyancy force

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2022.109075

Keywords

Turbulent pipe flow; Drag reduction; Large-scale control; Direct numerical simulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the control of skin-friction drag reduction in a fully developed turbulent pipe flow through direct numerical simulations. The heating and cooling of the pipe wall are uniform in the streamwise direction and vary in the azimuthal direction, leading to a decrease in skin-friction drag due to buoyancy force. The study identifies two different mechanisms for skin-friction drag reduction: stable stratification and large-scale vortical structures. The former directly attenuates turbulence through buoyancy force, while the latter creates wall jets and forms large-scale streamwise vortices that increase the coherent contribution to the skin-friction coefficient while indirectly reducing the random contribution.
Skin-friction drag reduction control for a fully developed turbulent pipe flow is performed using direct numerical simulations. Heating and cooling of pipe wall is homogeneous in the streamwise direction and varies in the azimuthal direction and buoyancy force induces the flow to decrease the skin-friction drag. The control parameters are the amplitude of buoyancy force and wavenumber of heating and cooling in the azimuthal direction. There are two different mechanisms of skin-friction drag reduction: stable stratification and large-scale vortical structure. In the former, the buoyancy force attenuates the turbulence directly. In the latter, the buoyancy force creates wall jets along the pipe wall, and a large-scale streamwise vortex is formed. The vortex increases the coherent contribution to the skin-friction coefficient, but it reduces the random contribution indirectly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available