4.3 Article

Do 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Levels Correlate With Fracture Complications?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
Volume 30, Issue 9, Pages E312-E317

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000639

Keywords

vitamin D deficiency; musculoskeletal trauma; fracture healing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine the relationship between serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] levels and the likelihood of postoperative complications and fracture reoperation rate in orthopaedic trauma patients receiving vitamin D and calcium supplementation. Design: Retrospective case series. Setting: Level I trauma center, Midwestern United States. Patients: All orthopaedic trauma patients-18 years or older-over a 20-month period were included with available initial and repeat 25 (OH)D serum levels. In total, 201 patients met inclusion criteria. Intervention: All patients received 1000 IU of vitamin D3 and 1500 mg of calcium daily. Vitamin D deficient and insufficient patients also received 50,000 IU of ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) weekly until 25(OH)D levels normalized or fractures healed. Main Outcome Measurements: fracture complications and 25(OH)D levels. Results: Fifteen patients experienced postoperative healing complications. There was no significant difference between initial (P = 0.92) or repeat (P = 0.91) 25(OH)D levels between patients with and without fracture healing complications. Twenty-eight patients required repeat orthopaedic surgery. There was no significant difference between initial (P = 0.62) or repeat (P = 0.18) 25(OH)D levels between patients who did or did not require repeat orthopaedic surgery. There was no significant difference between initial (P = 0.66) or repeat (P = 0.89) 25(OH)D levels between patients who did or did not require nonorthopaedic surgery. Conclusions: Serum 25(OH)D levels did not significantly affect the likelihood of fracture healing complications requiring surgery or any nonorthopaedic injury-related surgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available