4.5 Article

Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Fe-, S- and N-codoped TiO2 for sulfadiazine degradation

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s13762-023-04771-6

Keywords

Sulfadiazine; Antibiotics; NSFe-TiO2; Photocatalysis; Degradation mechanism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The composite material NSFe-TiO2 showed a significant improvement in the photocatalytic degradation efficiency of sulfadiazine compared to TiO2. The parameters such as NSFe-TiO2 loading amount, solution pH value, humic acid concentration, and recycle numbers were also studied. The results indicated that acidic conditions were not conducive to the photocatalysis, and certain substances in the water had mild inhibition on sulfadiazine degradation in the UV/NSFe-TiO2 system.
The composite material based on N-, S-, and Fe-doped TiO2 (NSFe-TiO2) synthesized by wet impregnation was used as a photocatalyst to rapidly degrade sulfadiazine. The photocatalytic degradation behavior and mechanism of sulfadiazine on NSFe-TiO2 were investigated for revealing the role of degradation under ultraviolet light. The results showed that compared with TiO2, NSFe-TiO2 markedly improved the efficiency in photocatalytic degradation of sulfadiazine: more than 90% of sulfadiazine could be removed within 120 min by NSFe-TiO2 dosage of 20 mg L-1. The process conformed to first-order reaction kinetics model. The parameters such as loaded amount of NSFe-TiO2, solution pH value, humic acid concentration and recycle numbers on removal efficiency were also studied. Compared to neutral and alkaline conditions, acidic condition was not conducive to the photocatalysis. HA, Ca2+, Cu2+ and Zn2+ in the actual water body had mild inhibition on sulfadiazine degradation in UV/NSFe-TiO2 system. Fragments screened by high-resolution mass spectrometry were conducted to explore the oxidation mechanism and pathways of sulfadiazine degradation. On the whole, UV/NSFe-TiO2 photocatalysis has a good effect on sulfadiazine removal.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available