4.7 Article

Evaluating the safety of perioperative dexamethasone treatment: A retrospective analysis of a single center pediatric low-grade glioma cohort

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 152, Issue 9, Pages 1875-1883

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34399

Keywords

dexamethasone; low-grade glioma; surgery

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In addition to surgical management, corticosteroids have been widely used in the management of acute symptoms related to CNS tumors, with dexamethasone being the most commonly used. However, recent in vitro data suggests a potential suppression of oncogene-induced senescence by dexamethasone in a preclinical pediatric low-grade glioma model, raising concerns about its safety. A retrospective analysis of 172 patients with pediatric low-grade glioma showed that perioperative dexamethasone application had no significant impact on short- and long-term tumor growth velocity and progression-free survival.
In addition to surgical management, corticosteroids have proven to be beneficial in the management of acute symptoms related to CNS tumors, and have been widely used for many decades, with dexamethasone (DM) representing the most commonly used agent. However, lately published in vitro data possibly indicates a DM-induced suppression of oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) in a preclinical pediatric low-grade glioma (pLGG) model, which, alongside data associating perioperative DM treatment with reduced event-free survival in adult glioma, raises questions concerning the safety of DM treatment in pLGG. A total of 172 patients with pLGG were retrospectively analyzed concerning the impact of perioperative DM application on postoperative short- and long-term tumor growth velocity and progression-free survival (PFS). Three-dimensional volumetric analyses of sequential MRI follow-up examinations were used for assessment of tumor growth behavior. Mean follow-up period accounted for 60.1 months. Sixty-five patients (45%) were perioperatively treated with DM in commonly used doses. Five-year PFS accounted for 93% following gross-total resection (GTR) and 57% post incomplete resection (IR). Comparison of short- and long-term postoperative tumor growth rates in patients with vs without perioperative DM application showed no significant difference (short-term: 0.022 vs 0.023 cm(3)/month, respectively; long-term: 0.019 vs 0.023 cm(3)/month, respectively). Comparison of PFS post IR (5-year-PFS: 65% vs 55%, respectively; 10-year-PFS: 52% vs 53%, respectively) and GTR (5- and 10-years-PFS: 91% vs 92%, respectively) likewise showed similarity. This data emphasizes the safety of perioperative DM application in pLGG, adding further evidence for decision making and requested future guidelines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available