4.7 Article

Low-dose naltrexone reduced anxiety in persons with multiple sclerosis during the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

INTERNATIONAL IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.intimp.2022.109438

Keywords

Anxiety; Depression; Low dose naltrexone; Disease -modifying therapy; Multiple sclerosis

Funding

  1. Patricia L. Unger Fund of Berks County Community Foundation
  2. Paul and Anna Shockey Family Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effects of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) therapy on anxiety and depression levels in persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) during the early months of COVID-19. The results showed that PwMS who were prescribed LDN, either alone or as an adjuvant therapy, had significantly lower self-reported anxiety and depression scores compared to those on oral disease-modifying therapies.
Persons with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) have been considered at high risk for vaccination and/or acquisition of COVID-19 related to their reduced immune systems and daily regimen of immune suppressing therapy. Sub-stantiated and unsubstantiated reports on these unknown circumstances increased anxiety and depression. Low -dose naltrexone (LDN) is a potentially effective off-label therapy shown to be effective at controlling fatigue for several autoimmune disorders including MS. This study utilized a small population of PwMS from central Pennsylvania in order to determine whether LDN therapy altered their perceived anxiety or depression during the early months of COVID-19. Utilizing mailed surveys, self-reported anxiety and depression scores were found to be significantly lower for PwMS who were prescribed LDN either alone or as an adjuvant to a standard disease modifying therapy (DMT) in comparison to those on oral disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). The data suggest that the non-toxic, inexpensive biotherapeutic may be beneficial in lessening anxiety.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available