4.5 Article

Dentine thickness in maxillary fused molars depends on the fusion type: An ex vivo micro-computed tomography study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL ENDODONTIC JOURNAL
Volume 56, Issue 5, Pages 637-646

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/iej.13891

Keywords

danger zone; dentine thickness; endodontics; fusion; microtomography; root canal anatomy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study used micro-CT to determine and compare the dentine thickness around root canals in fused maxillary molars. Results showed that the dentine thickness significantly decreased 2 mm apical to the orifice level regardless of fusion type. The minimum dentine thickness was found around the second mesiobuccal canal. The fusion type influenced the dentine thickness, with type 1 fusion having greater thickness around the mesiobuccal canal compared to types 2 and 3, while type 3 fusion had thinner dentine around the distobuccal and palatal canals.
AimThe present study aimed to determine and compare the dentine thickness around the root canals of maxillary molars with fusion using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT). MethodologyA total of 120 fused maxillary molars having more than a single canal with distinct canal orifices near the cementoenamel junction were selected from a pool of extracted maxillary molars, which were scanned on a micro-CT device (SkyScan 1172, Bruker-microCT). The minimum dentine thickness around the root canals in furcal direction was measured using CTAn software (v.1.18.8 Bruker-microCT) at each millimetre. The specimens were grouped according to their fusion type, and dentine thickness around the canals was compared. The data were statistically analysed using anova and post hoc Tukey-Kramer tests following an assessment of the normality of their distribution with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test (p < .05). ResultsDentine thickness showed a statistically significant decrease at 2 mm apical to the orifice level irrespective of fusion type. The minimum dentine thickness values were detected around the second mesiobuccal canal as 0.30 mm at 6 mm below orifice. Dentine thickness around the mesiobuccal canal was significantly greater in fusion type 1 than those of types 2 and 3 (p < .05), while those of distobuccal and palatal canals were significantly thinner in type 3 fusion compared with type 1 or 6 (pDentine thickness showed a statistically significant decrease at 2 mm apical to the orifice level irrespective of fusion type. The minimum dentine thickness values were detected around the second mesiobuccal canal as 0.30 mm at 6 mm below orifice. Dentine thickness around the mesiobuccal canal was significantly greater in fusion type 1 than those of types 2 and 3 ( ConclusionMinimum dentine thickness values at the danger zone of distobuccal and palatal canals change according to the fusion type in fused maxillary second molars.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available