4.3 Article

Cannula provoked upper extremity superficial vein thrombophlebitis: are we overtreating?

Journal

INTERNAL MEDICINE JOURNAL
Volume 52, Issue 11, Pages 1995-1997

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/imj.15951

Keywords

thrombophlebitis; cannula; venous thrombosis

Funding

  1. Australian Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that anticoagulation is unnecessary for most UESVT patients, especially those without cancer.
Cannula provoked upper extremity superficial vein thrombophlebitis (UESVT) is common. Retrospective audit of 93 consecutive patients, 51% male, median age 57 years (range 20-91), with symptomatic UESVT revealed varied management including symptomatic management (37%), prophylactic (37%) and higher dose anticoagulation (27%). There was 2% (95% confidence interval (CI) 0-7.6) thrombus extension and 1% (95% CI 0-5.9) major bleeding, both limited to cancer. We argue anticoagulation is unnecessary in most UESVT patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available