4.2 Article

A Vonoprazan, Clarithromycin, and Metronidazole Regimen as Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy for Patients with Penicillin Allergy in Light of Clarithromycin Resistance

Journal

INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 62, Issue 16, Pages 2301-2306

Publisher

JAPAN SOC INTERNAL MEDICINE
DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.0789-22

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori; eradication therapy; penicillin allergy; clarithromycin-resistance; vonoprazan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study assessed the efficacy of a vonoprazan (VPZ), clarithromycin (CAM), and metronidazole (MNZ) regimen in treating Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with clarithromycin resistance (CAM-R) and penicillin allergy. The results showed that the VCM regimen had a eradication rate of 94.3% and was effective for all patients with clarithromycin sensitivity (CAM-S). For patients with CAM-R, the success rate was 90.9%. Therefore, the VCM regimen may be a viable treatment option for patients with penicillin allergy, regardless of clarithromycin resistance.
Objective Vonoprazan (VPZ), clarithromycin (CAM), metronidazole (MNZ) and VPZ, MNZ, and sitaflox-acin (STFX) regimen are all established Helicobacter pylori eradication therapies for patients with penicillin allergy in Japan. However, no study has assessed the efficacy of a VPZ, CAM, and MNZ (VCM) regimen in patients with clarithromycin resistance (CAM-R). We therefore assessed the efficacy of a VCM regimen for treating H. pylori infection in patients with CAM-R and penicillin allergy.Methods Fifty-three patients with penicillin allergy who received H. pylori eradication therapy were retro-spectively analyzed. Eight patients received a 7-day proton-pump inhibitor, CAM, and MNZ (PCM) regimen; 35 patients [11 CAM-R, and 10 with clarithromycin sensitivity (CAM-S)] received 7-day VCM regimens; and 10 patients received 7-day VPZ, MNZ, and STFX (VMS) regimens. A 13C-urea breath test was used to determine eradication. The efficacy of eradication was evaluated via both intention-to-treat (ITT) and per -protocol (PP) analyses.Results According to ITT and PP analyses, eradication rates (ERs) with PCM, VCM, and VMS therapies were 50.0% and 50.0%, 94.3% and 100%, and 90% and 90%, respectively. Treatment was successful in all patients with CAM-S. For patients with CAM-R, treatment was successful in 10 patients, and 1 patient dis-continued treatment owing to an adverse event. According to ITT and PP analyses, ERs were 90.9% and 100% in CAM-R, and were 100% and 100% in CAM-S, respectively.Conclusion The VCM regimen for H. pylori eradication may be a viable candidate therapy for patients with penicillin allergy, regardless of CAM-R.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available