4.7 Article

Nonlinear Modeling and Feedback Control of Boom Barrier Automation

Journal

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages 4752-4763

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2022.3163692

Keywords

Linear matrix inequalities (LMIs); mechatronic industry; motion control; trajectory tracking

Funding

  1. BFT SpA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper addresses the modeling and control of a gate access automation system. A mechatronic system model is derived and identified, and an approximate explicit feedback linearization scheme is proposed to achieve almost linear response between the electronic driver duty cycle input and the delivered torque. Through offline solving of a nonlinear optimization problem, a feasible trajectory is generated and a low-level feedback controller is designed to track it. The proposed control strategy is tested on an industrial device and meets the requirements in terms of robustness, load disturbance rejection, and tracking performance.
We address modeling and control of a gate access automation system. A model of the mechatronic system is derived and identified. Then, an approximate explicit feedback linearization scheme is proposed, which ensures almost linear response between the electronic driver duty cycle input and the delivered torque. A nonlinear optimization problem is solved offline to generate a feasible trajectory associated with a feedforward action, and a low-level feedback controller is designed to track it. The feedback gains can be conveniently tuned by solving a set of convex linear matrix inequalities, performing a multiobjective tradeoff between disturbance attenuation and transient response. The proposed control strategy is tested on an industrial device. The experiments show that it can effectively meet the requirements in terms of robustness, load disturbance rejection, and tracking performance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available