4.7 Article

Robocentric Model-Based Visual Servoing for Quadrotor Flights

Journal

IEEE-ASME TRANSACTIONS ON MECHATRONICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMECH.2022.3231405

Keywords

Quadrotors; Visualization; Task analysis; Visual servoing; Estimation; Mathematical models; Predictive models; Model predictive controller (MPC); obstacle avoidance; unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV); visual servoing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article proposes a robocentric formulation for quadrotor visual servoing. Compared with other visual servoing methods, our method allows tightly and integrated state estimation and control on the same robocentric model, and allows a faster system response in aggressive quadrotor flights.
This article proposes a robocentric formulation for quadrotor visual servoing. This formulation presents the task-specific state dynamics of the quadrotor in its body reference frame. Compared with other visual servoing methods, our method allows tightly and integrated state estimation and control on the same robocentric model, and allows a faster system response in aggressive quadrotor flights. On the theory level, we prove the controllability and observability of the proposed robocentric model. Then, we design an on-manifold Kalman filter for the estimation and an on-manifold iterative model predictive control for motion planning and control. We verify our proposed formulation and controller in two crucial quadrotor flight tasks: 1) hovering; and 2) dynamic obstacle avoidance. Experiment results show that the quadrotor is able to resist large external disturbances and recover its position and orientation from two reference visual features. Moreover, the quadrotor is able to avoid dynamic obstacles reliably at a relative speed up to 7.4 m/s, demonstrating the effectiveness of our visual servoing methods in agile quadrotor flights.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available