4.7 Article

A Survey of Perception-Based Visualization Studies by Task

Journal

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3098240

Keywords

Data visualization; Visualization; Task analysis; Taxonomy; Encoding; Guidelines; Crowdsourcing; Visualization; perception; graphical perception; visual analytics tasks; evaluation; survey

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IIS-1845204]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This report provides a systematic review of perception-related research studies in the field of visualization, focusing on low-level tasks and breaking down techniques by visual encoding and visualization type. The report emphasizes the use of perception to evaluate the effectiveness of visualizations and helps readers apply the principles of perception in their visualization designs through a task-optimized approach.
Knowledge of human perception has long been incorporated into visualizations to enhance their quality and effectiveness. The last decade, in particular, has shown an increase in perception-based visualization research studies. With all of this recent progress, the visualization community lacks a comprehensive guide to contextualize their results. In this report, we provide a systematic and comprehensive review of research studies on perception related to visualization. This survey reviews perception-focused visualization studies since 1980 and summarizes their research developments focusing on low-level tasks, further breaking techniques down by visual encoding and visualization type. In particular, we focus on how perception is used to evaluate the effectiveness of visualizations, to help readers understand and apply the principles of perception of their visualization designs through a task-optimized approach. We concluded our report with a summary of the weaknesses and open research questions in the area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available