4.7 Article

A Model Fusion Method for Online State of Charge and State of Power Co-Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries in Electric Vehicles

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY
Volume 71, Issue 11, Pages 11515-11525

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TVT.2022.3193735

Keywords

Lithium-ion batteries; fractional- and integer-order model fusion; state co-estimation; OCV-SOC curve con- struction; dual extended kalman filter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper proposes a model fusion method for online state of charge and state of power co-estimation of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. By utilizing particle swarm optimization-genetic algorithm and dual extended Kalman filter algorithm, the estimation of battery SOC and analysis of SOP are improved significantly.
In this paper, a model fusion method (MFM) is proposed for online state of charge (SOC) and state of power (SOP) co-estimation of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) in electric vehicles (EVs). Firstly, a particle swarm optimization-genetic algorithm (PSO-GA) method is cooperated with a 2-RCCPE fractional-order model (FOM) to construct battery open-circuit voltage (OCV)-SOC curve, which only relies on a part of dynamic load profile without the prior knowledge of an initial SOC. Secondly, a dual extended Kalman filter (DEKF) algorithm based on a 1-RC model is employed to identify the model parameters and estimate battery SOC with the extracted OCV-SOC curve. Furthermore, battery polarization dynamics in a SOP prediction window is analyzed from two aspects: (1) self-recovery; and (2) current excitation. They are separately simulated using 2-RCCPE FOM and 1-RC model, and then integrated through a model fusion for online SOP estimation, which enables an analytical expression of battery peak charge/discharge current in a prediction window without weakening the nonlinear characteristic of FOM. Experimental results demonstrate the improved performance of the proposed MFM for online discharge SOP estimation, where the mean absolute error and root mean square error are only 0.288 W and 0.35 W, respectively, under the urban dynamometer driving schedule profile.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available